Skip to main content

Dialect Fusion, Cultural Appropriation, Queer Linguistics, and AAVE

We've all wanted to spill the tea on our new bae or comment on how you can't stop cheesin' because of what your new homie said, even though it was so not woke and probably cap - but do we know where these words come from, and should we be using them at all?

Much of the vocabulary we use and hear today has its roots in various oppressed subcultures, namely in African American spaces (especially by women,) and in spaces and media dominated by the LGBTQIA+ community. But with the rise of the digitization of these spaces through popular and social media, this language is spread through all social circles - circles that are ignorant of these terms' origins - and the line between subculture and mainstream is blurred by our new collective cultural consciousness on who can say what and why. The most prominent example of this is through the absorption of queer slang into our cultural knowledge thanks to popular media like RuPaul's Drag Race. However, recognizing the popularization of this slang as 'queer' or 'drag' slang is also incorrect, as the vast majority of this language originated from AAVE in specifically African American queer spaces - like the 1980s New York ball scene. 

Let's start with drag. The queer drag scene as we know it can be traced as far back as the 19th Century. Despite laws against homosexuality and gender non-conformity, and the huge prejudice against drag queens and queer people in general, cities like London, New York, Berlin, and Paris saw queer pioneers establish queer (safe)spaces like bars and clubs, as well as the first queer media like newspapers and newsletters. In the UK, queer men used Polari to communicate, a mix of languages from across the newly multicultural London, including Yiddish, Cockney, Thieves Cant, and Italian, as well as many other local languages and dialects. So many of the words that I still use today came from Polari, like trade, naff, and juz - yeah, juz!

In New York, the Harlem Resistance was in full force, and drag Masquerade balls became wildly popular amongst, especially black, queer folk. In the 1920s, this became the 'Pansy Craze' which created a broad vocabulary of uniquely queer terminology - which in a world so unfriendly queer spaces, became an especially comforting facet of the queer community. The popularity of this terminology is rather recent, because of its status as a language of a niche subculture, and queer reluctance to give up their uniquely queer vocabulary. However, despite pop culture's glad acceptance of these new terms, it's hardly a transition that all queer and black folk are happy with. 

Popular culture's acceptance of these new terms has led to many misunderstandings, with straight, white, and cisgender spaces misappropriating words like shade, werk, slay, and shade completely wrong, or proclaiming they're coming out as a Gaga stan. Whilst admitting to being a Gaga stan is pretty much what coming out really means, it's still technically wrong. Some terms, though, don't even find their origins in queer spaces. According to an article by WIRED, terms like spilling the tea and reading date back to African American spaces in the 1950s. Even quintessentially queer terms like voguing and throwing shade come from the drag balls of the 1980s in Harlem - a community known for its interconnection to black culture, populations, and history.  

When Madonna made voguing popular in 1990 with her music video for 'Vouge,' some accused her of profiting off the queer culture. However, I actually think that 'Vouge' did a lot for queer culture, especially drag balls like the ones in New York, Chicago, Baltimore, and Boston. I find that it improved awareness and acceptance of drag culture globally. Thanks, Madonna! 

The process of linguistic evolution, or dialect fusion, is a perfectly natural process. Language always reflects new groups and cultures within a society, and the influence of queer and black linguistics into our vocabulary should mean the continued incorporation and acceptance of queer and black people. Yiddish is such a perfect example. Terms like schmooze, chutzpah, klutz, and bagel have become such an integral part of the English American dictionary - especially as Jewish culture has become more accepted. I'll admit, even especially Jewish words like challah has entered my vocabulary as a blanket term for an especially airy bread.  

I'm not going to argue on the ethics of using this slang as a white queer person, a straight black person, or - God helps me - a straight white person. The use of this terminology is completely subjective to the environment in which we use them, the accent we adopt when using them, and the intentions behind why and when we use them. It's entirely dependent on so many different factors, and it's useless to try to police the evolution of the English language with what's 'right,' 'fair,' or 'good' anyways. As I've said, dialect fusion is a completely natural and inevitable process anyways, so embrace it. The only advice I can give is to listen to queer people, listen to black people, don't imitate, don't get defensive, be open to learning and evolving yourself, and embrace the advice, love, and corrections of our new slang's native speakers. 

07/06/2022

by Frankie E.J. Robinson

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Churches, Charnel Houses, and Catholic Repentance

So, in the 17th Century, the Portuguese were really into God. This meant that people were also really into being buried at their local church, cathedral, or other Christian-flavored places of worship. Over time, these place's cemeteries became full of bodies, and most churches resorted to stuffing skeletons behind the walls, underneath the floorboards, or just deeper into the cemetery. This meant that after a while, Iberian churches were just absolutely full of bodies, which wasn't exactly sustainable. Skeletons aren't exactly known for being that decomposable, even if their flesh vanishes pretty quickly, which led to churches literally overflowing with bones. During times of disasters and plague, churches would have to bury thousands of bodies at once, which left little room for other bodies.  The solution for this, the Portuguese Catholic establishment concluded, was bone houses, which became charnels in English. They're also known as Ossuaries in Latin, from the Lati...

An Argument for Barbie's Feminism

Barbie is almost always criticized by feminists, who claim that Barbie exemplifies the kind of compulsory heterosexuality, white imperialism, and oppressive patriarchy that feminists so hate. These claims aren't just based on suppositions, but more so on the heap of ethnographic research conducted amongst Mattel's consumers.  Barbie is a household name, having been a computer engineer, astronaut, rockstar, doctor, and even a presidential candidate. Over the last few years, Mattel has given Barbie a woke new makeover fit for the 21st century. I don't doubt for even a second that Mattel's re-invigoration of Barbie is motivated by anything but a consumerist need for more profit, but that doesn't mean that she isn't a feminist. One can have skewed motivations for their feminism, whilst still existing in a space that benefits and benefits and uplifts women. One of their latest adverts really does exemplify Mattel's newfound liberalism - and pulls on my heartstrin...

Capitalism, Class Mobility, and Ratatouille

Remy, the main character in Pixar's Ratatouille, is a metaphor for the literally starving, poor artist, who feels resentment towards a capitalist society whilst trying to climb its ranks and escape poverty. My mind simply shall not be changed. In the film, Remy's family exist purely to survive, and his dad has evolved to ignore Remy's love of his art - cooking - and dismiss his passions because passions are for the rich. His father only starts to care about Remy's talents when they become economically viable, and therefore beneficial to their survival as the poor.  When you start to think of the rats as the poor, and the humans as the rich, it starts to make much more sense. Remy yearns for the human (rich) experience because they have the ability to create art and pursue their passions with no care for material expense or wasted time. This is true in our society. Whilst the rich are free to pursue passions on a whim, able to purchase expensive materials easily, the poo...